|
|
![]() ![]() |
19 Jun 2012, 06:59
Post
#16
|
|
|
Trackhead ![]()
Group: PLUS+ Posts: 871 Joined: 16-April 11 From: Gateshead, Tyne & Wear, UK Member No.: 17,866 |
Which works better - I'm not sure - I do know that 4wd is the faster way around MY rally track - I did blind tests with my son removing the drive belt in his Avant slot EvoX It's horses for courses. I wasn't convinced of the benefit/necessity of a 4WD slot car, so the first couple I bought, I disabled the drive to the front. I haven't done any back-to-back RWD/4WD lap time comparisons on individual cars, but all my 4WDs are now 4WD and on my track (44mtrs) they are at least 2sec a lap quicker than any of my RWD cars. So I agree with RSClio. -------------------- Best regards,
Stuart. Araldite is my friend |
|
|
|
19 Jun 2012, 10:29
Post
#17
|
|
|
Tony ![]()
Group: PLUS+ Posts: 853 Joined: 4-June 12 From: Bognor Regis, On the South Coast, UK Member No.: 20,689 |
Hi John
I like a challenge and the Hawk 6 is small and powerful and can be tamed with an electronic controller and I am going to use Voki gears. I am already building a front wheel drive anglewinder mini clubman. It has 5/8ths wide sponge tyres and the rear wheels can revolve independently and the motor is a hawk with an Proslot Puppy Dog armamture. Tony -------------------- I'm Feeling Comfortably Numb
|
|
|
|
19 Jun 2012, 13:23
Post
#18
|
|
|
Trackhead ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 970 Joined: 8-August 07 From: England Member No.: 7,394 |
It must be horses for courses.
I remember the best 4WD car I'd ever seen suddenly started going better than ever. On careful inspection the reason for the extra speed became obvious - the front pinion had come unsoldered so it had converted itself to RWD. I think 4WD has the best chance of being competitive in relatively low grip situations - rather like it is in full size. |
|
|
|
19 Jun 2012, 19:18
Post
#19
|
|
|
Alexis Gaitanis ![]()
Group: PLUS+ Posts: 1,347 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Athens,Greece Member No.: 2,645 |
I just checked ratios of the Integrale.
Previous setup Rear 9/27 with wheel dia 19.5 or 20,41 mm/rotation Front 9/26 with wheel dia 16.8 or 18,260308 mm/rotation. The reason for using so small tires in front is that the car has to deal with several jumps so i want to give the guide maximum vertical travel. The car was tail happy. I switched to 9/23 in front or 20,642087 mm/rotation. At home it looks good,but will have to chek on cocoa at the club,next week.Will post results. I will also try is 9/24 in front or 19,782 mm/rotation |
|
|
|
20 Jun 2012, 11:19
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Learner Driver ![]() Group: PLUS+ Posts: 86 Joined: 11-March 09 Member No.: 11,686 |
|
|
|
|
22 Jun 2012, 18:32
Post
#21
|
|
![]() Trackhead ![]()
Group: PLUS+ Posts: 911 Joined: 5-January 08 From: Sussex UK Member No.: 8,352 |
I race a ninco pro race citroen and have the front spinning faster than the rear and it works much better to when I had it 50/50 split.
The front seems to pull it out the corners better and being 4wd still the braking is excellent. Its still very competitive against rwd rally cars although the msc scooby's that have made an apperance at the club are way ahead now (and they are all running rwd setup) So I've bitten the bullet and now run an msc RS200, rwd set-up with deeper guide and better tyres which is giving the scooby'sa run for the money. -------------------- Slot car scrap yard Does your car carry a doner card? |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th May 2013 - 02:53 |