SlotForum banner
1 - 20 of 23 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
238 Posts
Well I have to say I am not a beemer fan at all IRL.............however, that looks like a crackin model (another one for the wants list!) and I love the livery....the only thing that puts me off is I'm usually a bit disappointed with Fly when they're on the track.
 

·
Scott Brownlee
Joined
·
4,275 Posts
Got mine last night - lovely!

Rather than waste time taking bad pictuires myself I fould these.

The real thing



Minichamps 1:18 diecast



and the Fly slot car



So, nearly as good as a 1:18 diecast in terms of looks and detail, but with the added advantage that it goes and you can race it. That's why I love slot cars.

Scorr
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,493 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
just quickly comparing to the real photo the fly looks well wrong!

1) nose is too pointy
2) rear arch intakes look to narrow near the top flys dont
3) front wheels are too big
4) spoilers wrong
5) no window mesh
6) back end of the car is too low
7) very rear or rear wing is wrong shape...

Rob.
 

·
Jim Moyes
Joined
·
5,078 Posts
Yeah! And it doesn't look anything like my Scalextric ones, so it must be a mile out!

Sarcasm, that was.

Mr.M
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,587 Posts
Not again!
It`s pure slot porn that car. I love it. Goes well to (ok mag only) Compare it to the old Scaley version (still love that car) then gripe about how wrong your toys are!! Scott, imagine the impact if Mini Champs made 1/32 scale too. I know why they don`t but it would be awesome for us
Very sad for Fly
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
392 Posts
The real car has a look of lightness, and so the Minichamp diecast, in spite of the heavy fenders; the Fly model resembles a tank, particularly at the rear ( another little flop of the model maker), but if you like it or if you are a BMW lover, buy it without regret.

Ciao
 

·
Jim Moyes
Joined
·
5,078 Posts
Serious time, folks.

How can I say that, when talking about slotcars?

Got mine yesterday, too, truly wonderful looking car in my opinion and while Fly bring out stuff like this how am I ever going to break free from these "collector tendencies". I now find myself looking out for the other liveries that may be coming along.


Mr.M
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,587 Posts
I`m sold. This car looks great in the flesh so you can`t always go by the pictures. I was thinking
How many slot cars would stand up to this kind of scrutiny? Strikes me that the further you go back in time the worse the situation gets. When you stand next to the real car e.g. me and the TVR at Brands,then look at a model car, the perspective is so different I really wonder if you can ever be happy? To test this, name me one `perfect slot car`
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
752 Posts
With building a model of a historic racing car, you're faced with numerous problems....

What reference materials do you have available? Period photos? The actual car? - Now there's the problem! The actual car today, whilst it may have been restored, it may also have been rebuilt 2, 3, 4, 5, or maybe 6 or more times during it's life. During it's operational life the car is a tool to do a job - win races - little or no thought will be given to maintaining the original spec of it's build in subsequent rebuilds. At the end of it's working life the car may have been semi-scrapped, with parts scavenged, laying in a state of dis-assembly for many years before restoration.

So, come up-to-date, the car's a classic, a major slot car mfr now wants to make a model of it, what to do? The only period records of the car maybe only somewhat indistinct, colour unstable, front three quarter views. The only real recourse the model mfr has is to take measurements of the car as it exists today and hope that the restoration job has been accurate to the period, and not just restored to raceable state from it's last running incarnation with period livery applied to cloud the issue....

Y'see the problem? - Even during the race in question the car was changed visibly due to damage necessitating the replacement of the front spoiler/splitter - as a matter of course during the race the headlamp covers would have been discarded. All changes that affect the model maker's decision.

So, modelling a specific car at a specific point in time can be likened to attempting to nail jelly (or jello, for our transatlantic readers
) to a wall with six inch nails


-Rob
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,253 Posts
RR 3.9 Your observations are BANG ON! I was just saying something similar yesterday!

Old saying: If it looks like Sh*t, Smells like Sh*t & Tastes like Sh*t . . . . It MUST be Sh*t!!!

& this boys is some SWEET Sh*t!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,493 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
QUOTE perfect slot car

quite simple there aint one.

a good car that looks right would be umm teamslot integrale, old scalex 3**GTO red very flat very pointy was decored in rally livery, proslot GT3's are also pretty good.

Rob.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
752 Posts
Referring to my post about historical changes and jelly nailing exercises.....



Most cars ran with no centre support, and the daytona car would have probably been rebuilt as such later....

Who'd be a model maker eh?


-Rob

ps Looking again, the rear spoiler on this car is a pretty close match to the FLY model's.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
752 Posts
QUOTE Rob have you got one yet?

Errr... not yet


I'm looking at a number of acquisition options as we speak.....

QUOTE if/when I get one I think I might ahve to look at lowering the front

It might not be necessary, if you're basing that assessment on Jamie's car on it's plinth, because the fly plinth holds the nose artificially high - indeed from checking out various pics from numerous sources, raising the rear may be more accurate for the Daytona car. Checkout the Gaugemaster pic on page one of this thread of the posed car on track - the spoiler's nearly scraping the track - it's a shame that that pic is so over exposed, it's lost alot of the body detail due to burn-out.

-Rob
 
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
Top