[Neo]

Hi,
I did 6 design and dont know wich to choose to build my future trak ...

1

2

3

4

5

6

maybe you can help me

 

[LMP]

Either 2, or 6. If your planning on scenery I'd go with Cataluna because for one thing, you have the 1:1 circuit to go buy, and secondly, theres more space to put stuff.

Good luck

 

[Monaro]

I like 5 the best

 

[goldfish_samurai]

I like six, But I would maximise the length of the straight across the bottom.

Sorry, I took the liberty of editing the image....*

Woo! vote for track seven!

*quite badly.

 

[The Muffin Man]

5 or 6 for me.

 

[MR MAX]

6 is very technical but has a very nice straight. GT40's would be very much at home on a track like this, the Fly Corvette Coupe would get some great rear end powerslides also.

 

[jnr_seahorse]

4 or maybe 7!

 

[tDI_Fahrer]

I would take 6 too... but like Goldfishe's version!

 

[E-racing]

5

 

[MR MAX]

Yeah, Goldfish's version would keep speed up going into the corners.

 

[Swissracer]

2 or 7 (converted version of 6)
Points to take into account:

Access to the infield curves in case of deslot.
Driver stations-

Number 3 would also be interesting but only if you can place the driver station behind the track at top right, angled down from top to right hand side to limit drivers view obstructions. In this instance you would also require marshalls for each race OR accept long recovery time when crashing.
We find on 'Suzuka' that if you crash in a race with 4 or less people and are not using crash and burn, then 1 crash will finish the race for you most times.

 

[astro]

4 or goldfishes 7 - good straights and interesting other bits

 

[slotsutra]

You won't regret number 5 !!

-you can reach any deslotted car from where you stand, very important unless you have marshalls
- you have a good view on every part of the track from where you are standing

Like some other things I will not mention here : at first glance bigger seems to attract more but small and beautifull is better..also try them out if you can : on paper they look sometimes very good but in practise they can be disappointing..

If you have the space for the very large one I would prefer building 2 small circuits: 1 F1 and 1 rally (including cacao and flower on the track).

 

[ruhdwulf]

I like number 4 and the goldfish_samurai revision to number 6.

Mike

 

[marcelissen]

I vote for 5 or 6. But my first choice I think would be the version Goldfish provided.

 

[pupkick]

4 or 6.

I just don't understand the "wavy sections" people put in their tracks ala 1 and 3.

 

[goldfish_samurai]

I think Goldfish's version is the one to go for. Pure genius.

 

[Neo]

Thank's a lot for all your replys !!

I'm ok with Goldfish's version

just wana make a precision , I have put those curve there on the left back because the original track (1:1) is like this !

But never mind , I'm surly going to make this adaptation, it would give this :

I made a bit longer , 17.28m and 17.16m inside 5.00 / 1.75m

 

[astro]

looks really good! Personally not a fan of crossovers- imho it breaks up close racing unnecesarily - so I would replace with std curves. But each to their own

 

[CoolScientist]

Digital would work nicely on that track plan.......

CoolS