SlotForum banner
1 - 2 of 13 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
826 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Have had building this car in mind (and the required parts in boxes around) for years; at last, I managed to build it up last week. As maybe everybody knows Strombecker made an horrible version of their Lotus 30 for their '69 cheaper 6V sets, this one:

32394411627_347a3eb781_z.jpg

It sits so high that it seems more suitable for TT racing than for road racing. Main diference with the other Strombecker versions of the same car is that it has no chassis, but supports for axles, motor and guide projecting downwards from the body:

33460486758_5792030069_z.jpg

A fortunate fact is that a 1/32 Cox Cucaracha chassis/droparm fits perfectly both in lenght and between the rear axle support. Thus, after removing the guide and motor supports, as well as a piece holding the contrate in position, it is easy to open 1/4" holes on the rear axle supports and push fit nylon bearings (Dynamic?) holding the Cox chassis. That's the final result:

33460486408_57d977b458_z.jpg

32394411277_93149983b4_z.jpg

I was initially planning to use Cox rims, but there is no room enough for them at the rear, so I have used standard Revell's with inserts giving to he car the look of a late RTR Strombecker, which was the idea. Have added a yellow stripe and refited the original number roundel to the same end.

32394410967_a950e0a46d_z.jpg

The car is light (some 65 gr.) and performs quite well on the track (for a "RTR"), better than my more or less standard

old Revell and Monogram.

A final note for if somebody wants to make another: the front and rear axle bearings doesn't clip on the supports but slide in before installing axles, axle nuts and wheels. I tried to have them clipping, only to break a support: the remaining of the support after opening the hole at the rear seems to be too weak to resist clipping. Fortunately I had two of these bodies!

Cheers,

Eduardo
 

· Registered
Joined
·
826 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Nice car Eddie, I like the way you attached the body to the chassis. I assume you are using a 13D motor. In both your car and mine this allows the body to sit a bit lower on the chassis greatly improving the appareance (and also a bit the performance I suppose). To me, some otherwise excellently modeled 1/32 factory standard open cars are forced to be a bit too high due to the use of the 16D, Monogram's Chaparral may be an example.

Eduardo
 
1 - 2 of 13 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top