Aurora Tech Talk

Should be good for that one, I've started ordering parts

QUOTE (slowracer @ 31 Dec 2011, 11:28) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Steady on, your cars are fast enough already

As Red Bull will tell you, you have to keep making improvements otherwise the opposition catch up

QUOTE (Julian_Boolean @ 31 Dec 2011, 17:43) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>perhaps he's going to build a spare car.

Good guess

Almost right...two or three spare cars

Probably a couple of pancakes and a couple of G+
Just experimenting really, trying to find out WHY my cars are so quick because I really don't know

Shouldn't be worrying...the more spare cars I have the more I can lend out if anyone is struggling

There's still no guarantee I can replicate the speed of the ones I have anyway, maybe the pancake the the G+ seem so hit and miss

I don't worry, only when council tax bill reminder comes and I haven't the money for it

I think next thing on my shopping list will have to be a gauss meter

QUOTE (woodcote @ 5 Jan 2012, 16:31) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Are you sure they are AW X-traction and not AW Thunderjet 500 mags? The latter will be shorter and so slightly weaker.

Is it a big difference in strength?

Definitely X Traction, I took them out of an X Traction chassis

Fitted them into a MT chassis and gave it a spin around the CHORC track last night, and then my normal race car, there was no comparison

Here's a thought, although unlikely, I don't suppose the magnets are stronger in the 4 gear chassis and the Ultra G. I think it was magnets from an Ultra G that I used but I'm not sure.

QUOTE (slowracer @ 15 Jan 2012, 08:51) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Something that just came up in testing with the Magnatraction chassis, is not to run the front too low, the underside will bottom out too easily and unsettle it, as there is no magnet to pull it down to the track, definately need to have a ground clearance with these chassis!

I have my front as low as I can get it and the back jacked up quite high

QUOTE (pasiro @ 15 Jan 2012, 08:54) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I have my front as low as I can get it and the back jacked up quite high

I've just tried measuring the tyres but it isn't easy as the fronts are somewhere between the front wheel sizes and rear wheel sizes on the tyre gauge, and the rears are too big for any of the holes

I pretty good guestimate would be around .390 Front and about .480 rear

QUOTE (slowracer @ 16 Jan 2012, 11:30) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Mine are 385 front and 454 - 460 rear depends on the chassis

Wish I could find some that smaller for the front

QUOTE (pasiro @ 6 Jan 2012, 13:31) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I don't suppose the magnets are stronger in the 4 gear chassis and the Ultra G

OK I got another UG and 4G today, at first glance the magnets don't seem any stronger but I have a couple of ideas

On my normal race car the white magnet is at the front but on the two I've prepped ready for testing it's at the rear, not sure if this makes a difference or not as it just looks like they're painted wrong the polarity is the same on all three.

I've now fitted the wider AW pickups on the other two and my theory is this, not only is there more area to touch the track but there's more area near to the front magnets, in essence they act like a flux collector, a bigger flux collector than you'd get just using the narrow pickups, a bigger area for the magnetic pull to pass though!

Whether this is true or not I don't know, all I know is this; I can't get the grip from any other car than I can with the original that won the pancake cup and xmas do and that is the only car I've run wide pickups on so far. Maybe I just got lucky with the magnets, or maybe it is the pickups!

More testing needed