Joined
·
319 Posts
This might sound a strange dilemma, but if you bear with me dear reader, my crazy theory might make sense! Or Not!
Ok, my track http://www.slotforum.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=45248 is nearing the final week of essential scenic work (and audio stuff but it may take a while longer for that). As I've said before, rather like the Lego modeller credo of "dont harm the bricks", I've decided to keep both my Scaley micro and some remnants of the baseboard's former life as part of a railway layout intact. Now, my opinion on backscenes has changed somewhat. I've seen plenty of layouts ruined by poor dioramas (both railway and slotcars), and seeing as my 'day job' involves mainly painting landscapes - I've strangely had mixed fortunes myself also.
I'm at that stage of deciding whether to have another attempt -BUT, and it is a huge 'but' - I almost feel that having a backscene actually highlights the shortcomings of all model work -i.e. that we are required to suspend belief and 'see' the model from the front aspect, which is by necessity a cross section. Without one, we just accept the models, track, cars within that fantasy boundary, and almost intuitively screen out the bits that don't belong (the room walls, furniture etc etc). But the backdrop actually draws attention to the boundaries - especially the wall behind the layout as there is a handy 'join' between the intention and the reality of it.
I hope I've not lost everyone here lol, I'm just trying to ask, is it worth drawing attention with a 2D back diorama, or better to have a fully 3D layout that relies on the same suspension of disbelief that allows the other three sides of the layout to be exposed. I've been pondering this for 10 years now, and am still undecided (except from a photography point of view where they are very useful).
Over to you
PS forgot to mention that my setup is free standing!

Ok, my track http://www.slotforum.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=45248 is nearing the final week of essential scenic work (and audio stuff but it may take a while longer for that). As I've said before, rather like the Lego modeller credo of "dont harm the bricks", I've decided to keep both my Scaley micro and some remnants of the baseboard's former life as part of a railway layout intact. Now, my opinion on backscenes has changed somewhat. I've seen plenty of layouts ruined by poor dioramas (both railway and slotcars), and seeing as my 'day job' involves mainly painting landscapes - I've strangely had mixed fortunes myself also.

I'm at that stage of deciding whether to have another attempt -BUT, and it is a huge 'but' - I almost feel that having a backscene actually highlights the shortcomings of all model work -i.e. that we are required to suspend belief and 'see' the model from the front aspect, which is by necessity a cross section. Without one, we just accept the models, track, cars within that fantasy boundary, and almost intuitively screen out the bits that don't belong (the room walls, furniture etc etc). But the backdrop actually draws attention to the boundaries - especially the wall behind the layout as there is a handy 'join' between the intention and the reality of it.

I hope I've not lost everyone here lol, I'm just trying to ask, is it worth drawing attention with a 2D back diorama, or better to have a fully 3D layout that relies on the same suspension of disbelief that allows the other three sides of the layout to be exposed. I've been pondering this for 10 years now, and am still undecided (except from a photography point of view where they are very useful).
Over to you

PS forgot to mention that my setup is free standing!