[Tropi]

QUOTE come chat in www.ukchatrooms.net - General - Slotracer
NB - over 18 network

Not kicking up a stink but, after previous doubts discussed here regarding this chatroom and its proven history of insurrection etc plus association with 'over eighteen' (=sex rooms etc), what is the feeling regarding this link now being regularly posted as a signature in Slot Forum?

On an individual level, I couldn't care less - I'm a big boy, but what about the membership in general? Do we have any responsibility in that direction?

 

[Tropi]

When this subject first cropped up some months ago, my impression was that we preferred SF not to be associated, however lightly, with the chat room (and however innocent the motives of its owners). It seems we are of broadly similar opinion now, too.
I guess a diplomatically worded message to Astro, who seems a reasonable chap, might be better than just chopping his sig - any volunteers?

 

[Tropi]

It's a hard one this . . .
Astro is overall quite a sensible and nice guy - I think. I rather sneakily used him (and others) to successfully mould the volatile Mr Foord on occasion and that's no bad thing! He has obviously tried to oblige us by removing the link.

The trouble is I still have bad memories of the shennanigans certain people got up to in that room and I am naturally at least a little biased against it and some of its users. I would prefer we had no connection with it whatsoever, but I won't get on my high horse about it, even though inclined to agree with Julian.
I am calling it neutral for the present and see how the rest of you feel.

 

[Tropi]

That's a very sensible suggestion from Peter - what look like very resonable 'warnings' of necessity to be over eighteen are almost an open invitation to insalubrious types, a clear pointer, almost an advertisement directed to that end of the social spectrum.
Isn't language ambiguous sometimes!