SlotForum banner
1 - 20 of 5675 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,832 Posts
Am I missing something? Surely "starting" is when the car starts to move, not when the driver begins the procedure. You might have a very long-travel clutch and a handbrake to release in a vintage class. Anticipation of the start must be allowed. If the driver wants to risk it he/she can take a chance. If the car moves before the green, its a penalty. If its bang on the money then a couple of hundredths of a second are gained. You pays your money and you takes your choice.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,832 Posts
Some of us can remember when there was little or no TV coverage of F1, we would probably just get some very short highlights of the British GP and may be a race like Monaco and that would be it.
Ah, those were the days! The first F1 I can remember on tv (UK) was the 1957 Monaco GP and it must have been highlights as the races were much longer then. Motor racing wasn't allowed to spoil the uninterrupted afternoon of horse racing that was always shown. Snore. My next memory is of the 1958 Moroccan GP at Casablanca which IIRC was shown in full as it was the championship decider between Moss and Hawthorne. The horrible black pall of smoke from Stuart Lewis-Evans' fatal crash in the Vanwall was unforgettable.

I loved the commentaries by Raymond Baxter too. He didn't feel the need to talk gibberish incessantly or state the obvious. He commented when he was able to add something to what we could see with our own eyes.

Hunt was great as a commentator but Murray? Enthusiastic yes, entertaining yes, informative sometimes, exasperating mostly! I think that the standard of commentating today is superb, aided as it is with every electronic aid and stat. available. It's just a pity that the spectacle is so contrived.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,832 Posts
Fed up with tedious F1? Watch the Spa 24 hrs coverage from last weekend. Twenty four hours, each one with more action than a whole Grand Prix, utterly unpredictable, lots of different manufacturers each of which has cars which look (mostly) and sound different, constantly varying weather conditions, visiblilty and track temperature, plus night racing. What's not to like?
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,832 Posts
I can remember being very disdainful of Nikki Lauda when he first arrived in the UK competing in F2 because he was a rent-a-driver. It wasn't until he started winning GP's that I got over that feeling. He turned out to be pretty good, so maybe buying your drive should be seen as having a lot of faith in yourself, and a demonstration that you have sufficient talent to attract backers.

Having a wealthy father is quite different though.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,832 Posts
F1 generates too much money to be allowed to fail. Steam railways still operate so a way to avoid the pollution problem will be found. How much pollution does professional football generate? Not much on the pitch but plenty from spectator travel. That wont stop Im sure.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,832 Posts
The challenge is not in generating hydrogen - it is in creating an efficient fuel cell and safe means of storing liquid hydrogen so we arent driving around in bombs.

Car design is going to be interesting with fuel cells needing to only be a few centimetres thick. Your floor pan becomes the fuel cell, the motors sit inside the wheels
I can't see how the safety problem can be any worse than a tank full of petrol and we have been happy with that for over a century. As for pressurised containers on board, compressed air tanks are in normal use without problem. A catastrophic tank failure might not produce the conflagration feared as hydrogen disperses upwards very quickly together with the heat of its fire. There were a lot of survivors of the Hindenburg airship crash for this reason.

Re car design, might we see the return of a proper Mini? I hope so.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,832 Posts
I hope he does well as he is really showing some great ability in a pointless car ....
banana.gif
It often qualifies quicker than Ferrari who have a monster budget compared with Williams. Williams do a fantastic job with few(er) resources than the other teams and it is astonishing that they can be so close to the quicker teams in terms of lap times. They may be a second slower than the best teams but in a minute and a half lap time - just think about it. Count one second to yourself. Put Hamilton in the Williams and Latifi in the Merc and then see what the lap time difference would be.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,832 Posts
Am I right in thinking that no contributor to these posts believes Toto Wolff's explanation that the team radio failed on one side of the garage? It is more likely to be the truth than any conspiracy theory and fits the observable facts perfectly. Any skullduggery would be sure to be exposed and would tarnish Wolff's reputation for ever, so why bother? The principle of Occam's Razor is that if you reduce everything to the bare facts, then the simplest explanation of them is most likely to be the correct one.

As Trisha wrote (nearly)........ George Rex.
 
1 - 20 of 5675 Posts
Top