QUOTE And "tuning" is the act of physically altering the existing standard parts to make the car go quicker/last longer whilst staying within box standard club racing rules.
. . .
It is the "tuning" thing that I am not keen on as it is race fixing.
. . . "tuning" is in my mind rule bending and straying outside the spirit of box standard racing and is cheating.
It IS a grey are and, I think, will always remain so.
One good reason is that cars sometimes arrive with minor flaws/faults that can be fixed quite easily without materially improving over 'theoretical box standard'. ie, are simply brought back up to the state which another 'box standard' car might well have already enjoyed on delivery. For instance, if a contrate gear is a little bit mis-shapen or an axle is bent etc. And who could possibly know if someone had simply swapped around a whole pile of 'box standard' motors to find the best performer, yet without actually altering a single motor in any way?
I generally applaud idealism in the pursuit of fairness and equality, but almost by definition, there will always be aberrations that can be taken advantage of. If one owns two theoretically identical cars, but reality shows that one motor is markedly faster, only an idiot would choose the slow one. If the fast motored one has a slightly bent axle, again only a very silly person would hesitate in combining the good axle with the good motor in a single car. Etc.
QUOTE This is all very murky stuff.
The web sites refered to above don't really make it clear what is murky and what isn't. Maybe they should.
Yes it is a bit murky but I think unavoidably so and articles dealing with 'tuning', at whatever level, are simply there to impart knowledge. It is not their authors' function to dictate your club rules or your personal morality.
QUOTE not the advice which ends in ...off!
No, indeed, most of the advice is aimed at helping you to stay ON!
. . .
It is the "tuning" thing that I am not keen on as it is race fixing.
. . . "tuning" is in my mind rule bending and straying outside the spirit of box standard racing and is cheating.
It IS a grey are and, I think, will always remain so.
One good reason is that cars sometimes arrive with minor flaws/faults that can be fixed quite easily without materially improving over 'theoretical box standard'. ie, are simply brought back up to the state which another 'box standard' car might well have already enjoyed on delivery. For instance, if a contrate gear is a little bit mis-shapen or an axle is bent etc. And who could possibly know if someone had simply swapped around a whole pile of 'box standard' motors to find the best performer, yet without actually altering a single motor in any way?
I generally applaud idealism in the pursuit of fairness and equality, but almost by definition, there will always be aberrations that can be taken advantage of. If one owns two theoretically identical cars, but reality shows that one motor is markedly faster, only an idiot would choose the slow one. If the fast motored one has a slightly bent axle, again only a very silly person would hesitate in combining the good axle with the good motor in a single car. Etc.
QUOTE This is all very murky stuff.
The web sites refered to above don't really make it clear what is murky and what isn't. Maybe they should.
Yes it is a bit murky but I think unavoidably so and articles dealing with 'tuning', at whatever level, are simply there to impart knowledge. It is not their authors' function to dictate your club rules or your personal morality.
QUOTE not the advice which ends in ...off!
No, indeed, most of the advice is aimed at helping you to stay ON!
