[Robert Davies]

With out seeing the original model, I cannot comment on which photo is the best representation.

Personally I still prefer the original for detail recovery purposes. In the doctored pics there's too much information lost in the shadow areas for my liking. The third pic has alot of digital 'noise', under the sills, under the 16 on the side, and behind the rear arch.

Incidentally the first pic has a feel of a photo taken of the 1:1 car contemporary to when it was built.

A personal opinion only.

-Rob

 

[Robert Davies]

QUOTE (David Lawson @ 24 Nov 2004, 08:53)After two clicks for Instant Fix and Sharpen which took me about 10 seconds.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

The two clicks of 'Instant Fix and Sharpen' is a winner in my opinion

<mutter> Years I've wasted in photoshop.... and "Instant Fix and Sharpen" does that! <mutter>

-Rob