Just arrived this morning, a few pics for you to dribble over!
Had to take a picture of the magnet as well cause its massive, tyres need truing bounces well round my track but once done I think it will be fine. The motor is a bit slower than the other NC5 cars which I think improves the classics cars.
Very nice. The magnet can easily be removed, and I think the model should be balanced, maybe needs just a little weight on the front if the magnet is removed.
So I am very happy, at last a nice detailed model from Ninco. Are they back on track or is it just a one-off between their low detailed cheap range and low detailed expensive lightning range ?
Good news no weight needs to be added and I never do, front tyres trued about half the original size and a set of 15's scrub put on the back. Drives like a dream not as mad as a NC5 clad car, but good for the small twisty tracks and not bad on my layout.
Has anyone compared this with the Fly version of the same car, in terms of appearance and performance?
On that note, didn't Altaya come out with a version of the same car as well?? Why do manufacturer's feel the need to redo liveries already covered (in many cases very well) by other companies? Doesn't seem to make much sense to me, but other's may disagree.
hi, guys
Just resized all those pics from 1500 x 2000 down to the maximum allowable of 500 x 800. Please be aware that you can
resize with just about any photo software, or simply set the resolution of your camera which is even easier. Let me know
if you have any questions, or go to the Rules and Guidelines which discuss all this.
Phil...buddy, what else can we do but keep telling people? *grin*
I'm sure Phil knows exactly how to downsize a photo better than the rest of you ... Maybe he didn't want to so those of us who wanted to see the car in detail could actually see it ....
QUOTE (doncatwalker @ 15 Jun 2012, 18:59) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Has anyone compared this with the Fly version of the same car, in terms of appearance and performance?
Not yet, but I plan to.
QUOTE (doncatwalker @ 15 Jun 2012, 18:59) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why do manufacturer's feel the need to redo liveries already covered (in many cases very well) by other companies? Doesn't seem to make much sense to me, but other's may disagree.
I agree. (Puts on Spock voice....) It's illogical, Jim. Slot manufacturers, take note!
QUOTE (John Cahill @ 16 Jun 2012, 05:10) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Please be aware that you can resize with just about any photo software, or simply set the resolution of your camera which is even easier.
I find it easiest to use the parameters in whichever host I'm using.
''I'm sure Phil knows exactly how to downsize a photo better than the rest of you ... Maybe he didn't want to so those of us who wanted to see the car in detail could actually see it ....''
Lee - what is your problem bud? Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit - If he knew how to do then he deliberately ignored and broke the rules - and I am sure he did not do that... Please stop being so antagonistic - it is un-necessary
QUOTE (Flange @ 16 Jun 2012, 08:40) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I'm sure Phil knows exactly how to downsize a photo better than the rest of you ... Maybe he didn't want to so those of us who wanted to see the car in detail could actually see it ....
I just spent 20 mins resizing those pics, rather than delete them for being way too huge and actually way too many of them
as well. My mistake.
Anyway, just to be clear, 500 x 800 pixels is the maximum size. If you want more detail, take a closeup picture. I went
ahead and deleted my pics since you "couldn't actually see" them anyway.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could
be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
SlotForum
A forum community dedicated to slot car owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about collections, racing, displays, models, track layouts, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!