SlotForum banner
21 - 40 of 47 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
149 Posts
QUOTE (hankscorpio @ 3 Feb 2011, 01:27) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I might know someone who may swap your PB V1.x plus a wedge of cash for a PBPro V1.5 without SH already done and ready to go...

I might be in touch! The APB seems to be like gold dust at the moment. I am really, really trying to sit on my hands until I get the set... no point in buying a load of kit to then find something's not working. But it doesn't hurt to plan ahead
 

· David K Phillipson
Joined
·
1,886 Posts
QUOTE None of the Digital lane change challenges had a V1.5 in them... sad fact i know but unless somebody has "swapped" it out for a V1.5 at some point you will probably be dissapointed.

not true
I bought two of these and they were both v1.5
 

· 42 Yrs
Joined
·
2,230 Posts
Discussion Starter · #23 ·
QUOTE (davekp @ 3 Feb 2011, 10:07) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I bought two of these and they were both v1.5

Interesting that... there can't have been that many like that as the sets had the old style CLC's with the loose exit flippers... The "Fixed" CLC exit flippers appeared about the same time as the V1.5... did they come with the Fixed CLC's as well... If they did that would be an easy way to tell the PB Version inside...

Ive bought 3 and all were V1.2 & 1.4's... I was advised the only way to get a V1.5 is to buy one that was "Solo boxed"...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
228 Posts
Sorry Sean, I've had 4 sets with V1.5 units in.

I would be waiting until I could afford the entire upgrade........ though it depends what you want.

As has already been said, if you want ultimate power the simple h version of the C7030 is best. The C7042 has a limited power output and this is noticable on a large track with 6 cars and lots of L/Cs.

Also, I assume you have two PSU's for the C7030? I know where there are several (at least 4) of these gathering dust!

Ben
 

· Alfie Noakes
Joined
·
2,640 Posts
QUOTE (Minardi @ 3 Feb 2011, 11:16) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I also had 1 V1.5 in the Lane Change Challenge set, with fixed CLC's.

Me too also as well.
You can tell if it's a v1.5 because the start button has the arrow pointing to the left. All other versions point to the right. I think.
Cheers
Richard
 

· Trevor Gordon
Joined
·
1,446 Posts
Me too I also got the v1.5 in mine. hang on no I didn't.

As lovely as your explanation of all the options was, you missed my situation.

PB-Pro, S-H, Lap Tower, SSDC v4, always racing 6 cars but would love the Race Series option that comes with SSDC v5.

As far as I can tell I would be better off with the new one am I right? If so anyone want to swap what I have for a new one(note in NZ so postage is a little more)?

Edit: opps never mind, I think I'll hang onto it as a back up.
 

· Trevor Gordon
Joined
·
1,446 Posts
Yes, I've been watching that conversation and voted for it too, but it seems quite a lot of work needs to be done and I wonder if he charged for his time to make it backwards compatible the charge would be as much as buying a new one. Also how many of the new features will not be compatible. As I programmer I hate backwards compatability it makes the coding harder as you always have to keep the old hardware in mind in every decision. As a user I love it, though I think we pay a lot more for stuff to get that, I just don't see it being worth the overhead. Then it comes down to who pays for the extra overhead? The programmer, the new users or the old users. It's the programmers work, so that is up to him to decided but should not be expected of him. The new users don't require it so why should they pay for it. It comes down to those who want it but we don't want to pay for it otherwise we may as well get the upgrade. The only backward compatibility I think is really required is the transfer of old setting to new setting and only if that doesn't mean a loss of functionality. Eg if the old variable pace car data doesn't work with the new software, then don't allow it to be moved.

We all got the PB-Pro due to its better features, so I doubt many of us will be happy to miss out on the new features. 100 pounds and then I'm up to date does not seem like that much of cost. Also I am sure they are working hard to get the tower to work with the APB. The only reason I can see to hold off is the stability of the hardware on the new APB.

Wow, I think I've just convinced myself to get the new APB.
 

· 42 Yrs
Joined
·
2,230 Posts
Discussion Starter · #30 ·
He he he he....

I have a PBpro V1.5.... I'm intending to use the APB for my new loft layout BUT i will be hanging on to my V1.5 just in case... I know if i can convince Riko to do the dual analogue mod for me and the SH at the same time i will have the best of both worlds then buy a "massive PSU"... It would be the more powerful option.

I like the idea of blazing a trail with the new APB pushed to its limits... But with that much building involved I really do not want to run without a safety net... at least the cost of the conversion can be covered by the sale of the APB and PSU's if necessary... then i will just need a new lap tower... doh!

My only concern is the power loss ben (BBENSCA) noticed at the club with the APB compared to the normal SH Setup... seeing him saturday so will get the lowdown on his experiences first hand.
 

· 42 Yrs
Joined
·
2,230 Posts
QUOTE (distantkiwi @ 3 Feb 2011, 21:40) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>As lovely as your explanation of all the options was, you missed my situation.
PB-Pro, S-H, Lap Tower, SSDC v4, always racing 6 cars but would love the Race Series option that comes with SSDC v5.

Trev, I was in the same position as you... If dual analogue is important to you... I would reccomend the SH/Dual analogue mod to your PB...

Mainly because if you upgrade to the APB and use SSDC the PC cable plugs in where the "Naff" laptower plugs in and you lose it???? as SSDC takes over full control of the PB... Then you would need a new cable £30 and a SSDC Upgrade £20...

The dual analogue mod will put more power to the lanes 8 amps per lane instead of 2.5 amps per lane... But your "round the world postage needs to be factored in" but you probably already have the cable and SSDC V4.

There is an issue with the new APB i'm still not sure of for a big layout... In digital mode you get 5amps... but I'm not sure if thats still 2.5 Amps per lane as in analogue mode... If it is (based on how the relays are in the circuit it seems to be the case)... you could find times when 6 cars are in a single lane with only 2.5 amps between them... This is what scares me!!! It may or may not be a problem... only one way to tell for sure... try it!
 

· Greg Gaub
Joined
·
17,995 Posts
RichG, RikoRocket, or anyone who knows better can please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the APB can push 8 amps constant, 10 or more in bursts, to 6 digital cars. I assume it can push 4 amps to each lane for two digital cars.
As for Pb-Pro Simple-H 2-lane Analog, I think RichG mentioned somewhere that the 8 amps is just the rating on the relay, and he's never managed to pop one yet, so the practical limit is much higher.

5 amps would be a C7030 with NO simple-H upgrade and two Scalextric Power supplies.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
4,847 Posts
In digital mode the C7042 will supply 5 Amps continuous and up to 8/10 Amps for approx 2 seconds before overloading. In two lane analog mode I would expect, but have not measured, things to be the same. In other words a total of 5 Amps continuous or 8 Amps for approx 2 seconds, the current being available on a total basis to the 2 lanes.

This is because the voltage from the two supplies is combined and then fed to the output stages. In digital mode the 2 output stages are connected in parallel with a relay and in analog mode they are operated separately one feeding each lane. However the current monitoring takes place at a single point after the voltage dropper / regulator and before the two output stages. So the Powerbase does not know how much current is going to each lane, only the total.

On S-H yes the 8 amp limitation is the rating of the relay, in practice more current can be take without failure. However I have always strongly advised this in order to protect the long term reliability of the S-H setup. Which I have to say is excellent,
there are probably somthing in the order of 500 S-H units scattered around the World and the couple of failures that I know of were all due to the PSU being connected up the wrong way round.


Rich
 

· 42 Yrs
Joined
·
2,230 Posts
Discussion Starter · #35 ·
Nice explination Rich...

So the APB regulates the amps it outputs at a single point before the current is divided between the lanes... so uneven amounts of current can be pulled happily only being capped when both lanes are added together.... Thats cool.

So looks like the full amps are available in a single lane...in both modes.... so i should be ok!!! yipeee

Thanks as always rich
 

· 42 Yrs
Joined
·
2,230 Posts
oh ade dont.... I've been suffering that all evening!

I have just been rug racing with my APB to test the amps problem...

I stopped in the model shop to pick up a couple of R3's i didn't need for the layout just so i could build an all R3 setup on the rug... still my local shop has 20% OFF stock at 2 yr old prices walked out with a bag full of obscure bits for just over £50... got home at list that was almost 40% of current retail!!!! gotta love those guys at Gt Eastern in Norwich... just a shame they are giving up stocking scalextric.

Anyway back to the point... Trying to get six pace cars to run around even a large oval without nerfing took some fine tuning... but... in the end i managed to get them all up and running without making contact for 20 laps or so... The cars were about 60% of top speed on the edge of sliding 2xlighted F430 and 4xSR F430 all with magnets... so a pretty heavy load all running as pace cars... 2x C7042 PSU's... Vanilla .84 APB.

One car on its own was lapping between 2.55 and 2.60 seconds... consistantly

Six cars all in the same lane were lapping between 2.7 and 2.75 seconds consistantly...

Thats 0.15 drop in lap time... therefore a performance drop of about 7% between a single car and a full grid running pretty quick.... I could barely grab a car as it passed to take them off!!!! so this was a pretty good load test... will post more on my "build thread". click the Highlands link in my signiture.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
4,847 Posts
Sounds about right. I do not know what the relationship between voltage and speed is? I suspect it is not linear, but there is a 7% drop in output voltage when the Powerbase is driving 2.5 Amps to the track. For comparison a standard C7030 would see a 34% change and an S-H unit 2%.

Rich
 
21 - 40 of 47 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top