SlotForum banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

· Registered
4,591 Posts
Personally, my favourite was Porsche's argument for inclusion in the '69 (I think- where's me damn book... thanks, and the little pink pills) Le Mans with an illegal 'movable aerodynamic device'.
If I remember right, it went along the lines of 'We designed the car to run this way. It's unsafe without the wing, so we'll withdraw our entry if you don't let us use it'

Which seems to my cynically post-Hutton report mind to mean- 'We designed, built and entered an illegal car so that we could win this pifflingling little race of yours. But you can't throw us out because we'll withdraw if you do.'

Does that sound about right to you experts out there?
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.