[sealevel]

A little confusion for me...

1) When you say "In-to-Out" are you saying in the original direction or the reverse direction? (An In-to-Out appears as an Out-to-In in the reverse direction)

2) Chucking the curved crossover is understandable (forced lane change) but the flat crossover? Do you mean the CLASSIC track or the XLC?

I always love the amount of test work you do before and during a track build... carry on!

Cheers!

One further thought.... Reversing the electronics on an Out-to-In CLC makes it an In-To-Out curving the opposite way, right?
Maybe that is one way to keep the "errant" tracks... once I understand your interpretation (see question 1 above).

 

[sealevel]

QUOTE (hankscorpio @ 3 Feb 2011, 22:56) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>For flat crossover read "Straight Crossover" C8210 the one that comes in many kids sets...
Thanks HankScorpio,

Just a translation issue.... I would have called it an "intersection" but that is not what Scaley calls it.

Good idea to get rid of that one....

And thanks for the clarification on the Out-to-In. I would not even have thought of trying to run a digital track in reverse since the sensors are on one end of the LCs only.

Cheers!