SlotForum banner

2022 F1 models

5.8K views 33 replies 15 participants last post by  Philip P  
#1 ·
Hi all, does anybody know if there will be a generic 2022 F1 car released by any of the top manufacturers.. I thought i saw something in a post about this several months back, but cant find it now... Policar maybe?
 
#3 ·
Policar might make a move to release 2022 F1 cars but I don’t think so, because they have just about two years with the Monoposto F1 which is btw a great generic model with lots of decals to choose from, I’d like to think that will release the new model but being realistic with the costs of the production it’s unlikely they would…
 
#6 ·
Image

Well that would depend on how "generic" Policar's interpretation of a 2022 F1 car would be.
Main distinctive features for a 2022 F1 would be "18"inch wheels (14,8 mm ø 1/32nd) They have those, at least for the fronts.
So all needed here would be a new mould and tooling for the 14mm wide rear wheels/tires.
Construction of the current Generic F1 car is such that it would require "only" new tooling for a 2022 front and rear wing.
They could even sell those separately as a 2022 Upgrade kit ;)

With kind regards
Tamar
 
#4 ·
Might happen in a couple of years, not necessarily from slot it/Policar.

Seeing as scaleauto have jumped onto NSRs patch , perhaps they would be the ones, don't think that slot it /Policar have maximised their mould value yet.

Now what would be really interesting was if BRM came in with a 1/24 modern generic F1 car, remember they are launching a march 782 soon, on that chassis I guess they have pencilled in Chevron and Ralt bodyshells already.
 
#5 ·
NSR were certainly spitting feathers after Scaleauto announced their period generic and cheekily copied the naming convention introduced by NSR.
It would be a good response for Andrea and the team to release a 2022 style body.
There is a gap in the market (for a modern performance generic f1) since the exit of AllSlot from the scene.
AlanW
 
#11 ·
Might be worth waiting to see what the real cars look like.
Artists impressions produced before the real car have seen the light of day might look quite like the real cars, or might be quite a bit different.
All we've seen so far is the rule makers concept of what they hope the cars will look like. The teams will spend vast amounts of manhours and money trying to get a competitive advantage, sometimes they'll find some solutions that look unlike what the rule makers were expecting (for example the ugly noses in 2012)
 
#12 ·
At the recent NSCC weekend, Simon from Hornby stated that he would like Scalextric to make a generic F1 car that looks like the new style of cars. It would not be ready for release until end of 2022 earliest, maybe 2023 but they are planning to investigate the viability and they hope to make several team versions. I suspect that they would also make plain ones. I for one am keeping my fingers crossed. 😉
 
#14 ·
A generic F1 somewhat conflicts with the importance of accuracy so much emphasized in the Hornby / Scalextric documentary heavily featuring Simon Kohler which was on TV a few days ago.
Guess we don't get the full story on TV
I‘m guessing Scalextric see (at least) 2 different markets: the collector market, which wants high detail and accuracy, and the home racer market, which wants low cost and high durability. The generic F1 would fit in the home racer range, alongside their generic Le Mans racer and GT racer.
If I had any interest in models of today’s F1 monstrosities, I am sure I could detail a generic to make an accurate replica. Not likely to happen!
Mike
 
#29 ·
Success ballast was introduced to try and counter the RWD BMWs and 4WD Audi A4 quattro in the BTCC's supertouring days. The whole problem back then was that manufacturers were spending millions to try and dominate (and thereby ruin the show). Now everyone's got the same technology, the ballast is pegging back those drivers with a modicum of talent to spice things up.
 
#30 ·
I remember the last year the Passats ran and Jason Plato was runner up by something like 1 point ... success ballast almost never seemed to factor into his performance. He was as fast with 65 kg as he was empty.
This is going on memory though so I may be a bit... fuzzy...
What I presume is they try to make the best out of the situation, putting the weight wherever the car can handle it best and adjusting suspension and tire pressure accordingly.
Take Thruxton, you probably want your weight to helo in the fast corners by keeping the wheels on the ground or Rockingham (rest its soul) ... FWD and RWD can also benefit from the weight further forward or back..
I don't know the rules but I presume it all has to be in one chunk because Tom Ingram wants had to have a bunch of parts welded together because they hadn't planned on winning a race and they needed to way the car down!
This is a few years ago and again, from memory so I may be wrong.
Where are my pills...?
 
#31 ·
Think when the scooby leovorg started to show championship potential , they made then fasten the ballast high up under the dash position.

This was to counter it's advantage of low engine position,seem to remember it was a flat 4 engine.

Interesting to read today the 20 and 21 champ Ash Sutton has switched for 22 to motorbase ,running a Focus RS, teaming up with Dan Cammish.
THAT sounds like fireworks.